arizona budget

BANK LOBBYISTS CAN’T KEEP STORY STRAIGHT RE ARIZ. SENATE BILL 1271

Bank lobbyists told Arizona’s legislators that our anti-deficiency statutes needed to be revised because spec builders were “gaming the system” by claiming they lived in their spec homes to get anti-deficiency treatment.  The Senate’s internal memo on the bill stated that investment properties were “NOT” protected by existing anti-deficiency laws.  No one paid attention to the arguments or the law.  The bill sailed through both chambers without a fight and was signed into law. 

When real estate professionals and consumers realized what had happened, they were enraged, and a little embarrassed that such a spin job had just been orchestrated right under their collective noses.  As the complaints rolled in and problem after problem (with the bill) was highlighted, the banking lobby changed its tune.  Suddenly, the bill wasn’t just about spec builders, but more about investors and fraud on banks.  But remember, the legislature believed that investors didn’t get protection under existing laws.  So why in the world would the issue suddenly be about investors when the new law was passed with our lawmakers thinking they didn’t get protection anyway?

Why?  Because bank lobbyists knew they had been outed and also knew that placing the blame on “investors” plays well in the media.  At least until you stop and ask yourself “who is an investor”.  Banks would like you to think we are talking about institutional investors with pockets spilling over with cash.  This may be true for some homes purchased as investments, but it is far from the typical profile of an “investor”.

First, most big money home investors buy homes with cash – thus, there is no home loan and no issue of a deficiency.   Second, and most importantly, the typical investor I meet is your next door neighbor, your friend, your retired teacher or grocery store manager.  They are not ”rich”, are not trying to “game the system” and not void of moral guilt about being unable to pay their mortgage. 

The “investors” I meet are hard working, honest, credit worthy individuals that wanted simply to get a piece of Arizona’s real estate profits.  In many cases, they were counseled to buy a property by real estate agents, mortgage brokers, appraisers and lenders that all told the same story.  You know the fairy tale — prices will continue to rise, you’ll be able to sell the property in a year or 2 for a good profit, or refinance the loan into a better loan and pull money out.  Real estate prices never fall, so it can’t go wrong.  Nice story huh?  Too bad so many of us fell for it and are now holding the bag.

So, the closing occurred and lenders, mortgage brokers, appraisers, title companies and inspection companies all got paid.  The investor started making payments on its new found goldmine.  The loan was immediately sold, the bank replenshed its pockets and the process started anew with another credit worthy investor.   Until the bubble burst and we all realized we had been sold fools gold.  The “investor” now held an overvalued asset that couldn’t sell for the loan balance, and couldn’t be rented for anything close to satisfy the monthly payments.  Investors started losing jobs, the loan market dried up and lenders wouldn’t (and won’t) work with their borrowers to modify loans to match market conditions (despite Government assistance and lots of pushing).

So it is only logical that after fueling the real estate bubble in Arizona, banks want to change the anti-deficiency law with a minute to go in the game — right before a foreclosure occurs.  Selling or taking back the property they took as collateral is not enough they say — they need to take whatever hard earned money the investor may have left – wage garnishment, cash and securities, non-exempt assets.  You name it — they want it. 

Way to go Arizona’s legislature — keep giving banks another lifeline.  They haven’t received enough as it is.  Take away the one protection Arizona consumers have in the residential real estate market –they don’t need it.  After all, our State and Federal Gov’t will surely be giving consumers their own bailout soon — right???

Marc McCain

McCain & Bursh, PLC, Attorneys at Law

www.mccain-bursh.com

(602) 604-2138

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, August 1st, 2009 Current Events, Current Politics, Law 2 Comments

NO DECISION ON ARIZONA SENATE BILL 1271 — YET

1 Senate vote.  Just 1.  That’s all that was needed to pass Arizona’s 2010 budget and along with it, repeal Senate Bill 1271.  For those that have not been following this issue, Senate Bill 1271 amends Arizona’s anti-deficiency laws and allows a lender to sue many borrowers for the deficiency balance owed on a home loan after a foreclosure.  The bill was passed to assist Arizona community banks, although it helps ALL banks including those receiving Federal aid.  In addition, the abysmal wording of the new law takes many home loans out of anti-deficiency protection even if the borrower has lived in the home for years (see issues regarding certificate of occupancy requirements in prior blog entries). 

What is worse is that the legislation was passed based on an incorrect understanding of existing anti-deficiency laws (legislators were informed that current law does not give anti-deficiency treatment to investors of residential property — simply not true) and a complete bait-and-switch tactic employed by bank lobbyists to trump up support for their bill.  There is a fine line between truth and lies in politics and in my opinion bank lobbyists should be ashamed of themselves for their misleading tactics and utter spin job.

Fortunately, there is still hope that a budget will be approved that includes a repeal of Senate Bill 1271.  Urge your legislators to stand up for consumer rights and mandate that a repeal of SB 1271 be included in the budget proposal.  You can find email addresses of all legislators on www.azleg.gov.

As a side note, Senator Pierce, the sponsor of Senate Bill 1271, should be applauded for recognizing the problems with SB 1271 and publicly calling for its repeal.  Such an occurrence is rare in politics — kind of like a baseball umpire reversing his call.  Hopefully, the rest of our legislature can take Senator Pierce’s lead on this and do the right thing, at least for once.

Marc McCain

McCain & Bursh, PLC, Attorneys at Law

www.mccain-bursh.com

(602) 604-2138

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, August 1st, 2009 Current Events, Current Politics, Law 2 Comments